<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chick Lit: Good, Bad, or Ugly for YA?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://murphkel2003.wordpress.com/2007/02/01/chick-lit-good-bad-or-ugly-for-ya/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://murphkel2003.wordpress.com/2007/02/01/chick-lit-good-bad-or-ugly-for-ya/</link>
	<description>...I get a little bit closer to feelin' fine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:10:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: COMMENTS! &#171; A Finely Crafted Run-on Sentence</title>
		<link>http://murphkel2003.wordpress.com/2007/02/01/chick-lit-good-bad-or-ugly-for-ya/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>COMMENTS! &#171; A Finely Crafted Run-on Sentence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 06:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://murphkel2003.wordpress.com/2007/02/01/chick-lit-good-bad-or-ugly-for-ya/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>[...] THREE [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] THREE [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Comments &#171; Menagerie of the Mysterious</title>
		<link>http://murphkel2003.wordpress.com/2007/02/01/chick-lit-good-bad-or-ugly-for-ya/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>My Comments &#171; Menagerie of the Mysterious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://murphkel2003.wordpress.com/2007/02/01/chick-lit-good-bad-or-ugly-for-ya/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>[...]  Comment 1Comment 2Comment 3Comment 4Comment 5Comment 6Comment 7Comment 8Comment 9Comment 10 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Comment 1Comment 2Comment 3Comment 4Comment 5Comment 6Comment 7Comment 8Comment 9Comment 10 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muire</title>
		<link>http://murphkel2003.wordpress.com/2007/02/01/chick-lit-good-bad-or-ugly-for-ya/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>muire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 03:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://murphkel2003.wordpress.com/2007/02/01/chick-lit-good-bad-or-ugly-for-ya/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>This article seems to be very informative about a certain type of YA Chick Lit, and the comparison to Sex &amp; the City seems very appropriate! I would agree with the article’s point that these types of Chick Lit are not positive examples to use in the classroom. I would not however jump on the censorship train and agree with the assumption that all YA Chick Lit is inappropriate. Jenny pointed out The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants as a positive example of YA Chick Lit- I would agree. There are many examples of this genre that are eminently useful in the classroom. Are You There God? It’s Me Margaret by Judy Blume would be another. Even The Babysitter’s Club and Sweet Valley High series promote more positive outlooks—even if they are formulaic and a bit fluffy to older readers. The point is the books mentioned by the article are not the only options out there! 

I think that this is a great topic murphkel2003, I look forward to more information!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article seems to be very informative about a certain type of YA Chick Lit, and the comparison to Sex &amp; the City seems very appropriate! I would agree with the article’s point that these types of Chick Lit are not positive examples to use in the classroom. I would not however jump on the censorship train and agree with the assumption that all YA Chick Lit is inappropriate. Jenny pointed out The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants as a positive example of YA Chick Lit- I would agree. There are many examples of this genre that are eminently useful in the classroom. Are You There God? It’s Me Margaret by Judy Blume would be another. Even The Babysitter’s Club and Sweet Valley High series promote more positive outlooks—even if they are formulaic and a bit fluffy to older readers. The point is the books mentioned by the article are not the only options out there! </p>
<p>I think that this is a great topic murphkel2003, I look forward to more information!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://murphkel2003.wordpress.com/2007/02/01/chick-lit-good-bad-or-ugly-for-ya/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 19:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://murphkel2003.wordpress.com/2007/02/01/chick-lit-good-bad-or-ugly-for-ya/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have much experience with Chick Lit (except for Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants??? does that count??) but I think I can see the reluctance that some parents and teachers would have about making chick  lit available to their students. Thanks for recommending a &quot;good&quot; piece of YA chick lit when some of the most popular examples are a bit questionable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have much experience with Chick Lit (except for Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants??? does that count??) but I think I can see the reluctance that some parents and teachers would have about making chick  lit available to their students. Thanks for recommending a &#8220;good&#8221; piece of YA chick lit when some of the most popular examples are a bit questionable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
